Margo G. Wootan and Robert Liodice has
different perspectives on should the government has regulation on food
commercials or not. Wootan supports the idea because he thinks there are too
many children with obesity. Therefore, the government should have regulations
on food manufacturers marketing strategies. However, Liodice does not support
the way the Wootan's claim. He believes regulating commercials by manufacturers
violate the first amendment, which states that everyone in the U.S. have
freedom of speech. After reviewing both arguments, I think Liodice has better
argument on the issue. He points out there arr varies problems
of “Guidelines for Responsible Food Marketing to Children” by the
Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). He also states that
government should find alternatives to solve obesity. I think he analyzed the
issue thoroughly while Wootan only states his stance. Consequently, I think
Liodice’s statement is more trustable and better!
Thank you for reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment